Quality markers in cardiology: measures of outcomes and clinical practice—a perspective of the Spanish Society of Cardiology and of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

The complexity of the individual patient and organization of medical practice results in important institutional and country quality of care variability. – 17 Attempts to assess the quality of clinical practice have established rating systems that may yield completely different results and rating for the same hospital during the same period of time, adding confusion rather than help to prove their usefulness and, questioning whether existing measures can actually measure quality. – 35 Most important, benchmarking may be associated with progressive improvement both in performance and outcomes, – 38 highlighting the relevance of standardization of quality measures and the responsibility of scientific societies.